Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2181 - 2190 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2181 - 2190 of 68458 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Dale Steinbach
the statements. First, Steinbach asserts that reversal is mandated because the court did not properly poll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10716 - 2017-09-20
the statements. First, Steinbach asserts that reversal is mandated because the court did not properly poll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10716 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“originated around milepost 4,” but he did not specify the highway where the complaint originated. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02
“originated around milepost 4,” but he did not specify the highway where the complaint originated. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02
State v. Pha Vue
for the pictures to be developed, Smith told Vue that he did not want to ask him any questions. Vue was there only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31
for the pictures to be developed, Smith told Vue that he did not want to ask him any questions. Vue was there only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence does not include evidence that did not exist or could not have been discovered at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
evidence does not include evidence that did not exist or could not have been discovered at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
uncharged offenses. We determine that although the guilty plea proceeding did not strictly comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
uncharged offenses. We determine that although the guilty plea proceeding did not strictly comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
J. W. v. B. B., M.D.
the plaintiffs have alleged in this action. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18299 - 2005-07-06
the plaintiffs have alleged in this action. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18299 - 2005-07-06
State v. Scott Allen Hamilton
assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that Hamilton waived his right to testify, the court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15797 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that Hamilton waived his right to testify, the court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15797 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
block from the mini-mart and had been fired in August 2008. He stated that after he was fired he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
block from the mini-mart and had been fired in August 2008. He stated that after he was fired he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
State v. Kevin J. McKillion
the incident for which he was charged. McKillion contends that: (1) the evidence did not fall within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24622 - 2006-03-27
the incident for which he was charged. McKillion contends that: (1) the evidence did not fall within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24622 - 2006-03-27
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
that there had been a mistrial, and that some witnesses who had testified at the first trial did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2008-09-19
that there had been a mistrial, and that some witnesses who had testified at the first trial did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2008-09-19