Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 66207 for did.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 66207 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald L. Williams - 2021AP000040
in the chairs between Williams and the door. Williams was not handcuffed, but he did have shackles on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547708 - 2022-07-26
in the chairs between Williams and the door. Williams was not handcuffed, but he did have shackles on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547708 - 2022-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer - 1994AP002016
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7995 - 2017-09-19
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer - 1994AP002015
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer - 1994AP002016
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer - 1994AP002015
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arturo Hernandez - 2006AP000750
, the jury instructions were not defective, and the attorney did address on cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27936 - 2014-09-15
, the jury instructions were not defective, and the attorney did address on cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27936 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County - 1996AP003670
conclude the attorneys did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
conclude the attorneys did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County - 1995AP003424
did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both judgments awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both judgments awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County - 1995AP003424
conclude the attorneys did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10092 - 2017-09-19
conclude the attorneys did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10092 - 2017-09-19
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County - 1996AP003670
did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both judgments awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31
did not advance frivolous claims in either instance and therefore reverse both judgments awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31