Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 66208 for did.

State v. Charles Edward Hennings - 2004AP001132
that there had been a mistrial, and that some witnesses who had testified at the first trial did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charles Edward Hennings - 2004AP001132
witnesses who had testified at the first trial did not testify at the second trial. Hennings’s lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert L. King - 1997AP001509
peremptory strikes of older females during voir dire did not violate King’s right under the No. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert L. King - 1997AP001509
it ruled that the prosecutor’s peremptory strikes of older females during voir dire did not violate King’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12523 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sidney Clark - 2010AP000790
block from the mini-mart and had been fired in August 2008. He stated that after he was fired he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22

The Copps Corporation v. Labor & Industry Review Commission - 1999AP002171
] Kertis did not deny that he left the store early, but claimed that he was doing work at home or visiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15894 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] J. W. v. B. B., M.D. - 2004AP000009
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ordering disclosure of the physician’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18299 - 2017-09-21

J. W. v. B. B., M.D. - 2004AP000009
the plaintiffs have alleged in this action. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18299 - 2005-07-06

[PDF] G. M. v. B. B., M.D. - 2004AP000011
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ordering disclosure of the physician’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18300 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Copps Corporation v. Labor & Industry Review Commission - 1999AP002171
prevention specialist then confronted Kertis regarding the discrepancies.2 Kertis did not deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15894 - 2017-09-21