Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 14290 for probate.
Search results 211 - 220 of 14290 for probate.
State v. Robert B. Ciarpaglini - 2006AP001187
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2008-05-06
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2008-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Jeremiah J. Purtell - 2012AP001307
computer. In denying Purtell's motion to suppress, the circuit court reasoned that the probation agent's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118829 - 2014-09-15
computer. In denying Purtell's motion to suppress, the circuit court reasoned that the probation agent's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118829 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric Jean Overvig - 2019AP001786
two years on probation, and applied WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) to order that Overvig serve twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
two years on probation, and applied WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) to order that Overvig serve twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
Corey J. Hampton v. David H. Schwarz - 2001AP000639
. Corey J. Hampton, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order affirming his probation revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3694 - 2017-09-19
. Corey J. Hampton, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order affirming his probation revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3694 - 2017-09-19
Corey J. Hampton v. David H. Schwarz - 2001AP000639
. Corey J. Hampton, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order affirming his probation revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
. Corey J. Hampton, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order affirming his probation revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley - 1999AP003328
. This case presents two issues.[1] First, we must decide whether as a condition of probation, a father
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17587 - 2005-03-31
. This case presents two issues.[1] First, we must decide whether as a condition of probation, a father
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Kingstad - 1999AP001177
of No. 99-1177-CR 2 probation because such a requirement is only permissible when imposed in lieu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21
of No. 99-1177-CR 2 probation because such a requirement is only permissible when imposed in lieu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dante R. Voss - 2004AP003106
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss - 2004AP003106
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dante R. Voss - 2004AP003107
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18388 - 2005-06-01
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18388 - 2005-06-01