Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 66208 for did.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 66208 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Tommie S. Gray - 1997AP001754
. at 376, 407 N.W.2d at 245. The trial court’s findings of what counsel did or did not do and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
. at 376, 407 N.W.2d at 245. The trial court’s findings of what counsel did or did not do and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tommie S. Gray - 1997AP001754
did or did not do and the basis for the challenged conduct are findings of fact that will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
did or did not do and the basis for the challenged conduct are findings of fact that will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse - 1998AP001978
. This agreement did not contain the language in paragraph 15 of the first agreement giving Lesky the first option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31
. This agreement did not contain the language in paragraph 15 of the first agreement giving Lesky the first option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen M. v. Craig P. - 2001AP000608
. On April 3, 2000, at an initial hearing, Craig did not appear in person but appeared by his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
. On April 3, 2000, at an initial hearing, Craig did not appear in person but appeared by his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
Karen M. v. Craig P. - 2001AP000608
3, 2000, at an initial hearing, Craig did not appear in person but appeared by his attorney, Marcus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
3, 2000, at an initial hearing, Craig did not appear in person but appeared by his attorney, Marcus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Omarr T. Moore - 2014AP000085
both testified. Gomez said that during the preliminary, unrecorded conversation, Moore did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127139 - 2017-09-21
both testified. Gomez said that during the preliminary, unrecorded conversation, Moore did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marlon Powell - 2007AP001862
that the plea colloquy did not show that he understood the elements of the crime to which he pled. Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34847 - 2014-09-15
that the plea colloquy did not show that he understood the elements of the crime to which he pled. Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34847 - 2014-09-15
State v. Latrice A. H. - 2008AP002959
that the trial court did not find the rehabilitative testimony irrelevant, that it allowed some testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35647 - 2009-02-23
that the trial court did not find the rehabilitative testimony irrelevant, that it allowed some testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35647 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Latrice A. H. - 2008AP002959
this testimony to be irrelevant. This court’s review of the record reveals that the trial court did not find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35647 - 2014-09-15
this testimony to be irrelevant. This court’s review of the record reveals that the trial court did not find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones - 2005AP000207
. ¶4 On cross-examination, Thrower testified that Jones never asked what would happen if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
. ¶4 On cross-examination, Thrower testified that Jones never asked what would happen if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21