Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 20762 for warrants.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 20762 for warrants.
State v. Quran R. Hereford - 2013AP002015
that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116159 - 2014-07-07
that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116159 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
State v. Quran R. Hereford - 2013AP002015
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Parnell Terrance Graham - 2019AP000495
. In sum, the application of the PMR law is not a new sentencing factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
. In sum, the application of the PMR law is not a new sentencing factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Whittley - 2020AP001095
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Wendt - 2010AP000075
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John Edward Kraemer - 2004AP002075
enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined a curative instruction to avoid highlighting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined a curative instruction to avoid highlighting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy Truvelle Williams - 2004AP002759
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeremy Truvelle Williams - 2004AP002759
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
State v. Robert Wendt - 2010AP000075
whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County - 1995AP000734
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31