Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 67241 for had.

Diana K. O. v. Rick D. R. - 2007AP002618
to present evidence that showed Rick had assumed parental responsibility, including evidence of Rick’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33423 - 2008-07-16

[PDF] Diana K. O. v. Rick D. R. - 2007AP002618
had assumed parental responsibility, including evidence of Rick’s relationship with Lailah during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33423 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Rachael A. Dickenson - 2015AP000277
. Rohrer found that the vehicle had been traveling from the south entrance of the cemetery to the north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143920 - 2017-09-21

Janell R. S. v. J.R. S. - 1996AP003308
because she believed that J.R. had abused Jake. After a mediation attempt failed, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11715 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mayfield Pennington - 1999AP003171
, one of L.P.’s teachers overheard him tell a classmate that he had lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16273 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rachael A. Dickenson - 2015AP000277
that the vehicle had been traveling from the south entrance of the cemetery to the north exit, but that the north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07

State v. Leroy M. Godard - 2010AP001731
. Part of the strategy by trial counsel was to claim that the accomplices had a “deal” to testify because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66224 - 2011-06-21

[PDF] State v. Leroy M. Godard - 2010AP001731
-CR 2 accomplices had a “deal” to testify because neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Wendell L. Gaines - 1994AP001225
police officer arrived, determined that the car was inoperable, and at Gaines's request had it towed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7868 - 2017-09-19

Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek - 2002AP000750
the title owners of the disputed land and, in the alternative, that they had acquired ownership of the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31