Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 63340 for b's.

State v. Lee Thomas Lasanske - 2012AP002016
portion of the bifurcated sentence under § 973.01(2)(b) and extended supervision under § 973.01(2)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108251 - 2015-06-03

County of Milwaukee v. Ryan A. Muhammad - 2007AP000658
. Accordingly, Muhammad’s due process rights were not violated under the facts and circumstances of this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30324 - 2007-09-17

State v. Timothy Melvin Sloan - 2012AP001182
. §§ 948.03(2)(b), 947.01, 946.49(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] Attorney Faun Moses has filed no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117171 - 2014-07-13

[PDF] Brown County v. Sarah D. - 1998AP002617
§ 48.415(2)(b), STATS., and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion by terminating Sarah’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14479 - 2017-09-21

Brown County v. Sarah D. - 1998AP002617
a diligent effort to provide court-ordered services to Sarah and Rachel as required under § 48.415(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14479 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Earl Z. - 2010AP000704
of the seventy-two-hour time limit for emergency detention pursuant to § 51.15(4)(b). ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54754 - 2014-09-15

Wendy S. DeHart v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company - 2005AP002962
in a hit-and-run accident,” pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4)(a)2.b., and therefore the statute mandates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25229 - 2006-06-27

Milwaukee County v. Earl Z. - 2010AP000704
to § 51.15(4)(b). ¶2 We conclude that, to the extent that the County preserved a potential topic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22

Florence County Department of Human Services v. Jennifer B. - 2011AP000089
of parental rights to Sierra B., a person under the age of 18: Florence County Department of Human Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70135 - 2011-08-18

[PDF] Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment - 1996AP002306
the zoning administrator’s interpretation of Dane County Ordinance § 10.123(9)(b). We NO. 96-2306
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19