Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 20760 for warrants.

State v. Jeremiah J. Lambert - 2007AP000285
factor warranting sentence modification. The trial court summarily denied the motion; Lambert appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31847 - 2008-02-19

[PDF] State v. Jeremiah J. Lambert - 2007AP000285
factor warranting sentence modification. The trial court summarily denied the motion; Lambert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31847 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rolando S. Cortes - 2010AP000621
warrant’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55040 - 2010-10-04

State v. Paul James Bach - 2013AP002137
to get a search warrant to locate additional items he believed Bach had hidden while Olson was waiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118619 - 2014-07-30

[PDF] State v. Jonathan D. Marshall - 2012AP001892
have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant failed to establish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102564 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jonathan D. Marshall - 2012AP001892
of the search warrant failed to establish probable cause for the search. The applicable test is whether, under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102564 - 2013-09-30

[PDF] State v. Rolando S. Cortes - 2010AP000621
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55040 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lavelle P. Jackson - 2006AP003139
action was not a Riverside violation, because his arrest was not without a warrant. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35365 - 2009-01-28

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Westcott, II - 2019AP001150
was instructed to ignore it, any error was harmless and did not warrant a mistrial. Westcott again moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453186 - 2021-11-16

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas - 2005AP002523
of law. We agree that the seriousness of Attorney Nickitas' misconduct warrants the suspension of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06