Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 66208 for did.

[PDF] State v. William A. Boyer - 2013AP002726
did not understand that he would lose his right to possess a firearm upon a felony conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149022 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert B. Sonnenberg - 2012AP001025
that he had been consuming alcohol prior to and while driving that day. Sonnenberg testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87060 - 2012-09-18

[PDF] State v. Glenn S. Gessner - 2008AP000574
to pay child support in 2001 through 2003. At trial, he asserted the affirmative defense that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34342 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William Teletzke v. Douglas Nickel - 2008AP001422
an expert’s affidavit. Counsel again agreed.2 ¶6 The Teletzkes did not file an affidavit from an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36418 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
. Because the assessment did not include a proper No. 95-0306 -2- account for expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8586 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Karla R. Merkes - 2001AP001474
to arrest her. We conclude the officer did have probable cause, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20

William Teletzke v. Douglas Nickel - 2008AP001422
did not file an affidavit from an expert. The other defendants wrote the court stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36418 - 2009-05-06

State v. Karla R. Merkes - 2001AP001474
. We conclude the officer did have probable cause, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31

Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
expenses. Because the assessment did not include a proper account for expenses, it was not fixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8586 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steven C. Hinzmann - 2001AP001950
contends that since he did ultimately agree to submit to a blood test, the purpose of the refusal statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31