Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 68458 for did.
State v. Edward H.
. Kimani’s seven-year-old brother, Antoine, also testified that Edward “sucked my brother’s stuff” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4994 - 2005-03-31
. Kimani’s seven-year-old brother, Antoine, also testified that Edward “sucked my brother’s stuff” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4994 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel P. McGhee
contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8298 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not understand that he would lose his right to possess a firearm upon a felony conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149022 - 2017-09-21
did not understand that he would lose his right to possess a firearm upon a felony conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an expert’s affidavit. Counsel again agreed.2 ¶6 The Teletzkes did not file an affidavit from an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36418 - 2014-09-15
an expert’s affidavit. Counsel again agreed.2 ¶6 The Teletzkes did not file an affidavit from an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
-1950 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(9). He contends that since he did ultimately agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
-1950 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(9). He contends that since he did ultimately agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had been consuming alcohol prior to and while driving that day. Sonnenberg testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87060 - 2012-09-18
that he had been consuming alcohol prior to and while driving that day. Sonnenberg testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87060 - 2012-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
asserted the affirmative defense that he did not have the ability to pay child support. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34342 - 2008-10-20
asserted the affirmative defense that he did not have the ability to pay child support. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34342 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
State v. Tammy M.
because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make a reasonable effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24821 - 2017-09-21
because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make a reasonable effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ralph Lubitz v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
finding that the University did not retaliate against Lubitz and that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15229 - 2017-09-21
finding that the University did not retaliate against Lubitz and that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15229 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce into evidence the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce into evidence the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07