Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 66208 for did.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 66208 for did.
State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum - 1999AP002641
window down. ¶3 The driver did not roll his window down, so Skelton yelled at him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
window down. ¶3 The driver did not roll his window down, so Skelton yelled at him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus Serrano - 1995AP002639
faced. Serrano did not seek to either withdraw his plea or enforce the plea bargain. Rather, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
faced. Serrano did not seek to either withdraw his plea or enforce the plea bargain. Rather, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann - 2001AP001950
-1950 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(9). He contends that since he did ultimately agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
-1950 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(9). He contends that since he did ultimately agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tony Colunga - 2009AP003039
in providing a limiting instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60767 - 2014-09-15
in providing a limiting instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60767 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tony Colunga - 2009AP003039
instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce into evidence the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce into evidence the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
Thomas Vitrano v. Monique Lessard - 2010AP002503
that his claim was improperly dismissed because the trial court did not grant him an adjournment when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74798 - 2014-09-15
that his claim was improperly dismissed because the trial court did not grant him an adjournment when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74798 - 2014-09-15
Ralph Lubitz v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission - 1999AP000628
the WPC’s factual finding that the University did not retaliate against Lubitz and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15229 - 2005-03-31
the WPC’s factual finding that the University did not retaliate against Lubitz and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15229 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenn S. Gessner - 2008AP000574
asserted the affirmative defense that he did not have the ability to pay child support. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34342 - 2008-10-20
asserted the affirmative defense that he did not have the ability to pay child support. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34342 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
McDonald Enterprises/Fond du Lac Limited Partnership v. Excel Engineering, Inc. - 2009AP000193
the subdivision, but that such unreasonable action did not interfere with McDonald’s use and enjoyment of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51717 - 2014-09-15
the subdivision, but that such unreasonable action did not interfere with McDonald’s use and enjoyment of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51717 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tammy M. - 2006AP000121
) were not proven because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24821 - 2006-04-17
) were not proven because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24821 - 2006-04-17