Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 68458 for did.
State v. Michael C. Cull
this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did not voice a refusal and further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did not voice a refusal and further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his claim was improperly dismissed because the trial court did not grant him an adjournment when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74798 - 2014-09-15
that his claim was improperly dismissed because the trial court did not grant him an adjournment when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74798 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tammy M.
) were not proven because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24821 - 2006-04-17
) were not proven because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24821 - 2006-04-17
[PDF]
State v. David T. Hyland
thus remand for the State to attempt to show that, regardless of the flawed plea taking, Hyland did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16053 - 2017-09-21
thus remand for the State to attempt to show that, regardless of the flawed plea taking, Hyland did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16053 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
contends that since he did ultimately agree to submit to a blood test, the purpose of the refusal statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
contends that since he did ultimately agree to submit to a blood test, the purpose of the refusal statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karla R. Merkes
to arrest her. We conclude the officer did have probable cause, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20
to arrest her. We conclude the officer did have probable cause, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
�
court stated that it “was watching the jury most of the time” and did not notice the juror sleeping
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95486 - 2014-09-15
court stated that it “was watching the jury most of the time” and did not notice the juror sleeping
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95486 - 2014-09-15
State v. Edward H.
. Kimani’s seven-year-old brother, Antoine, also testified that Edward “sucked my brother’s stuff” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4994 - 2005-03-31
. Kimani’s seven-year-old brother, Antoine, also testified that Edward “sucked my brother’s stuff” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4994 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel P. McGhee
contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8298 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in providing a limiting instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60767 - 2014-09-15
in providing a limiting instruction to the jury concerning the fact that the State did not introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60767 - 2014-09-15