Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 44507 for adult name change.

Kurt Ohrmundt v. Greg Demark - 1998AP000378
and injured by a German Shepherd, named “Dakota,” that resided in the home. The home was owned by Roger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13610 - 2005-03-31

State v. Amy M.A. - 1996AP001429
conditions when it was shown that Amy had satisfied all of the conditions of supervision except for naming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10845 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Cheryl R. v. Waukesha County - 2013AP000669
809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm the order of the circuit court. Cheryl has an adult son named Jason S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106033 - 2017-09-21

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Sandra N. - 2012AP000812
The Department of Human Services presented two witnesses. Barbara Bloom-Mikulsky, from Brown County Adult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93567 - 2013-03-04

[PDF] State v. Amy M.A. - 1996AP001429
of supervision except for naming a gang member who had sold her drugs because she was concerned for her safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10845 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Mary J. Stephanek v. Estate of Dorothy Martha Stephanek - 2014AP001774
by their first names for clarity. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144641 - 2017-09-21

Mary J. Stephanek v. Estate of Dorothy Martha Stephanek - 2014AP001774
died intestate on September 13, 2007. She was survived by her two adult children, Mary Jane and James
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144641 - 2015-07-14

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Sandra N. - 2012AP000812
witnesses. Barbara Bloom-Mikulsky, from Brown County Adult Protective Services, testified and filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93567 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Judith A. Ladwig v. Daniel J. Ladwig - 2012AP000494
, the party seeking modification must demonstrate that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94513 - 2014-09-15

Judith A. Ladwig v. Daniel J. Ladwig - 2012AP000494
a substantial change in circumstances warranting the proposed modification.” Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94513 - 2013-03-31