Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 67241 for had.
Search results 1931 - 1940 of 67241 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Gordon E. Sussman - 2007AP000687
in which the therapist stated that the victim had firmly denied any inappropriate contact with Sussman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33494 - 2014-09-15
in which the therapist stated that the victim had firmly denied any inappropriate contact with Sussman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33494 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell - 2001AP000108
detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required for a lawful detention, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required for a lawful detention, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Joshua Beaulieu v. David H. Schwarz - 2001AP001803
¶5 In addition, agent Karen Lindholm testified that Gruper had told her two days before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4145 - 2017-09-20
¶5 In addition, agent Karen Lindholm testified that Gruper had told her two days before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4145 - 2017-09-20
Joshua Beaulieu v. David H. Schwarz - 2001AP001803
In addition, agent Karen Lindholm testified that Gruper had told her two days before the revocation hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4145 - 2005-03-31
In addition, agent Karen Lindholm testified that Gruper had told her two days before the revocation hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell - 2001AP000108
was the result of an unlawful detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
was the result of an unlawful detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sarah J. Katula-Talle - 2019AP001622
testified to the following facts.2 ¶3 Tenold first had contact with Katula-Talle on February 18, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293794 - 2020-10-06
testified to the following facts.2 ¶3 Tenold first had contact with Katula-Talle on February 18, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293794 - 2020-10-06
State v. Heidi Strom - 1995AP002236
slurred. Officer Antisdel also stated that Strom admitted that she had been drinking prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9516 - 2005-03-31
slurred. Officer Antisdel also stated that Strom admitted that she had been drinking prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9516 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County - 1995AP003414
a dispute of material fact whether the County had actual notice of her claim. Because Lamkin fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
a dispute of material fact whether the County had actual notice of her claim. Because Lamkin fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County - 1995AP003414
of material fact whether the County had actual notice of her No. 95-3414 -2- claim. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19
of material fact whether the County had actual notice of her No. 95-3414 -2- claim. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald P. Sullivan - 1995AP003508
by considering a companion charge of which he had been acquitted. He further argues that the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
by considering a companion charge of which he had been acquitted. He further argues that the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19