Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19101 - 19110 of 38705 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Steven Buckingham - 1997AP001208
would require exclusion of any statement made by a declarant not present at trial, such a result has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Rolando M. Tong - 1997AP002539
to his friends.” According to Van Horn’s recorded statement, which was incorporated into Powell’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven Buckingham - 1997AP001208
reading of the Confrontation Clause would require exclusion of any statement made by a declarant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky - 2012AP000740
, and fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b),[1] and (2) making false statements of fact or law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky - 2012AP000740
2 lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b), 1 and (2) making false statements of fact or law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105746 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader - 2017AP000411
report was filed, the OLR filed a restitution statement stating that it does not seek restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222212 - 2018-10-16

State v. James D. Lammers - 2008AP002574
that this statement references facts not of record and the State concedes that there is no evidence to show that Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39591 - 2009-09-28

[PDF] State v. James D. Lammers - 2008AP002574
we will charge you with perjury. Tell the truth.” Lammers contends that this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39591 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ernest E. Burton - 2001AP000069
with a friend” to the court’s attention until his postconviction motion. Burton’s attorney’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3479 - 2017-09-20

W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation - 1996AP000246
their appraisal report to DOT along with a statement for services in the amount of $2,473. DOT sent Merten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31