Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 191 - 200 of 492 for ot.

[PDF] State v. Stewart D. Brown - 2020AP000526
, is there anything you wish to disagree with or to ask questions about,” and Brown responded with “[n]ot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318045 - 2020-12-23

State v. Leslie B. Falls - 2014AP001502
at the postconviction motion hearing to be “self-serving” and “[n]ot always on point.” By contrast, the court found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142472 - 2015-05-26

[PDF] State v. Philip H. Joiner-El - 2009AP000390
7 Indeed, Joiner-El’s argument that the bat presented at trial “was [n]ot the weapon claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50468 - 2014-09-15

State v. Philip H. Joiner-El - 2009AP000390
at trial “was [n]ot the weapon claimed to have been used” is essentially a contention that he must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50468 - 2010-05-26

[PDF] State v. Michael D. Sykes - 2003AP001234
had any identification. Sykes said, “[N]ot on him but he had it in his wallet.” He then asked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Donte L. Moss - 2008AP000033
admonition.” Genova v. State, 91 Wis. 2d 595, 622, 283 N.W.2d 483 (Ct. App. 1979). “[N]ot all errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34395 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Radiology Consultants v. Lee H. Huberty, M.D. - 2001AP001821
was in violation of his Master Employment Agreement in which he agreed “[n]ot to engage in, or work for, any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4150 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Billy J. Staves - 2016AP000609
no indication whatsoever.” Defense counsel reiterated that he was “[n]ot prepared to deal with party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] AASEW-WAA supplemental letter, by Attorney Driscoll
by mitigating the spread of COVID-19 within congregate ot shated living settings, or thtough unsheltered
/news/docs/aaswe_waa_driscoll.pdf - 2020-10-21

State v. Frank E. Mallett - 2004AP000401
received psychiatric care. However, “[n]ot every mentally disordered defendant is incompetent; the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7304 - 2005-03-31