Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 38705 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 38705 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman - 2004AP001686
, at the postconviction motion hearing, improperly allowed testimony regarding statements of a confidential informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
, at the postconviction motion hearing, improperly allowed testimony regarding statements of a confidential informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ladarius J. Boyce - 2020AP000589
of the facts Boyce presents is at odds with statements given to the police by Boyce’s co-actors, as detailed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462642 - 2021-12-14
of the facts Boyce presents is at odds with statements given to the police by Boyce’s co-actors, as detailed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462642 - 2021-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Tony Mora - 2012AP001874
to the presentence investigation report on the grounds that it relied upon statements from a detective about Mora’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96222 - 2014-09-15
to the presentence investigation report on the grounds that it relied upon statements from a detective about Mora’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96222 - 2014-09-15
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Mario M. Martinez - 1998AP001496
and falsely certifying on his State Bar dues statements that he maintained those records, failing to deliver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17404 - 2005-03-31
and falsely certifying on his State Bar dues statements that he maintained those records, failing to deliver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Walter V. Rupar, III - 2012AP000801
recording of Rupar’s statement to police, which was played in relevant part for the jury at his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96867 - 2014-09-15
recording of Rupar’s statement to police, which was played in relevant part for the jury at his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Mario M. Martinez - 1998AP001496
account records and falsely certifying on his State Bar dues statements that he maintained those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17404 - 2017-09-21
account records and falsely certifying on his State Bar dues statements that he maintained those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17404 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul L. Watson - 2009AP001136
did not see the victims’ videotaped statements before his plea, and he wanted to go to trial. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
did not see the victims’ videotaped statements before his plea, and he wanted to go to trial. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
[PDF]
Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission - 2020AP002003
-22)1 requires ballot questions to contain a "concise statement of each question." However, WJI has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656770 - 2023-07-06
-22)1 requires ballot questions to contain a "concise statement of each question." However, WJI has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656770 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
State v. James F. Karls - 1998AP000695
saying that he had discharged the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
saying that he had discharged the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
State v. James F. Karls - 1998AP000695
the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro se. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro se. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31