Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18861 - 18870 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 18861 - 18870 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
upon the prosecutor’s statement. Defense counsel argued the statement was inflammatory and “could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16
upon the prosecutor’s statement. Defense counsel argued the statement was inflammatory and “could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Ellef E. Ellefson
that, even if the admission of the statement from the PSI was error, it was harmless. ¶8 The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2569 - 2017-09-19
that, even if the admission of the statement from the PSI was error, it was harmless. ¶8 The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2569 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
-CRNM 3 Prior to entry of his plea Jones filed a motion to suppress statements he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99310 - 2014-09-15
-CRNM 3 Prior to entry of his plea Jones filed a motion to suppress statements he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99310 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and he eventually signed the form waiving his rights. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
), and he eventually signed the form waiving his rights. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donald J. Dockry
) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving that caused a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31
) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving that caused a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
clearly credited the officer’s “unshaken” statements that the blue lights were lit. And, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
clearly credited the officer’s “unshaken” statements that the blue lights were lit. And, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenging the admissibility of her statements to law enforcement. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
challenging the admissibility of her statements to law enforcement. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a suppression motion seeking to exclude all evidence seized and statements that both he and the driver made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
a suppression motion seeking to exclude all evidence seized and statements that both he and the driver made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is to ensure the reliability of testimony by allowing the accused to challenge a witness’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
“is to ensure the reliability of testimony by allowing the accused to challenge a witness’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Louis Ray
. 1989). Ray asserts that statements such as those made in Simons and Kimpel conflict with federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19
. 1989). Ray asserts that statements such as those made in Simons and Kimpel conflict with federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19