Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18781 - 18790 of 39967 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] NOTICE
. Had he testified consistently with the statement to the police, the testimony would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33726 - 2014-09-15

State v. Hector J. Boissonneault
making such a statement to his trial counsel or even discussing the presentence report with him prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11748 - 2005-03-31

State v. Todd R. Jones
statements to the court constituted a request for new counsel and thus the circuit court was obligated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20653 - 2005-12-14

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
not understand or trust the general society [and] probably fears it”; and (3) “[t]he statement that [Yolanda] had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2365 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
gave a statement to police. He was charged with first-degree intentional homicide. Pretrial, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27843 - 2014-09-15

State v. Milton F. Pozo
evidence statements that the truck had sustained no damage. A motion for mistrial is addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14022 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
was, in fact, induced by concern over Juror 57’s statement and the judge’s reaction to it. His answers during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jennie K. Vasen v. Progressive Insurance Companies
in the complaint was caused by the collision. Vasen contends that this statement proves that the damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21

State v. Arthur L. Robinson
the admissibility of a statement of a defendant after a plea of guilty is entered; however, he argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
that his no contest plea was, in fact, induced by concern over Juror 57’s statement and the judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12759 - 2017-09-21