Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18431 - 18440 of 38697 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Barry Thorud - 2011AP000343
upon the prosecutor’s statement. Defense counsel argued the statement was inflammatory and “could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80927 - 2012-04-16

[PDF] State v. Altonio Laroy Chaney - 2011AP000207
that justifies resentencing because the circuit court relied on Gurley’s statement when it imposed sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72642 - 2014-09-15

State v. Julian C. Holt - 1995AP001726
, Holt contends that various of the prosecutor's statements at closing arguments so infected his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9251 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tomas C. Cuesta - 2001AP003113
statements to police, Laura identified Cuesta as her assailant, but later recanted. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4614 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dung Tran Nguyen - 2002AP002813
. 2 Oehmke also testified regarding a statement filled out by an Amoco employee. This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5801 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Arlie I. Grenie - 2010AP000459
clearly credited the officer’s “unshaken” statements that the blue lights were lit. And, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15

Columbia County v. Tyler C. Schleicher - 2001AP000020
arrested him continued questioning him after he asked for counsel, and that statements he made should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3464 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ardie Byrd - 1996AP002227
of the possible penalties? THE DEFENDANT: Yes Byrd claims this statement by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ardie Byrd - 1996AP002227
? THE DEFENDANT: Yes Byrd claims this statement by the trial court confused him and did not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19

State v. Andrew M. Hansen - 2004AP000597
, 675 N.W.2d 804 (Wis. Jan. 23, 2004) (No. 02‑1670-CR). ¶9 Hearsay is a statement, other than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7348 - 2005-03-31