Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 66208 for did.
Search results 1831 - 1840 of 66208 for did.
State v. Manuel Villarreal Frausto - 2013AP002498
. The court determined that the defense psychological evaluation did not give enough consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
. The court determined that the defense psychological evaluation did not give enough consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
State v. Loteria Ln Harris - 2013AP001921
] to drop the firearm,” which she did and then “walked quickly into the crowd.” Fields was not able
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113299 - 2014-05-27
] to drop the firearm,” which she did and then “walked quickly into the crowd.” Fields was not able
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113299 - 2014-05-27
State v. William R. Junnor - 2004AP001299
. Because the trial court did not err in denying the suppression motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
. Because the trial court did not err in denying the suppression motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
State v. Fairly W. Earls - 2000AP002303
: And did you notice anything like that? A: Again, she resisted suggestibility. And she appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
: And did you notice anything like that? A: Again, she resisted suggestibility. And she appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul J. Fargo - 2010AP002578
did not render the videotape inadmissible. ¶5 The circuit court found that Wis. Stat. § 908.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
did not render the videotape inadmissible. ¶5 The circuit court found that Wis. Stat. § 908.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
Bruce Scott Johnson v. - 1997AP003220
was personally served with the Board’s complaint in this proceeding, but he did not answer or otherwise appear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17322 - 2005-03-31
was personally served with the Board’s complaint in this proceeding, but he did not answer or otherwise appear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul D. Shegonee - 2003AP002132
] concluding the State did not intentionally subvert Shegonee’s protection against double jeopardy. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6760 - 2005-03-31
] concluding the State did not intentionally subvert Shegonee’s protection against double jeopardy. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gloria J. Baker - 2000AP001873
that day. ¶3 The parties both testified the written lease did not contain the monthly amount due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
that day. ¶3 The parties both testified the written lease did not contain the monthly amount due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gloria J. Baker - 2000AP001873
an additional $375 that day. ¶3 The parties both testified the written lease did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2797 - 2005-03-31
an additional $375 that day. ¶3 The parties both testified the written lease did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2797 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jennifer Vian - 1996AP000820
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10575 - 2005-03-31
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10575 - 2005-03-31