Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 5953 for la.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 5953 for la.
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: Michael J. Mulroy, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: Michael J. Mulroy, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
William Prestwood, Jr. v. Bluebird Springs Recreational Area, Inc.
, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4721 - 2012-05-31
, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4721 - 2012-05-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
government, interfere with the conduct of legislative affairs." State ex rel. La Follette v. Stitt, 114
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242640 - 2019-06-21
government, interfere with the conduct of legislative affairs." State ex rel. La Follette v. Stitt, 114
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242640 - 2019-06-21
State v. James R. Thiel
Argument: April 30, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: La Crosse Judge: Dale T
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31
Argument: April 30, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: La Crosse Judge: Dale T
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31
Joyce A. Devenport v. Paper Recycling Company
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paper Recycling of La Crosse, a Wisconsin corporation, and General Casualty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17493 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paper Recycling of La Crosse, a Wisconsin corporation, and General Casualty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James A. Finch v. Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Keiffer of Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Skemp & Sleik, La Crosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5717 - 2017-09-19
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Keiffer of Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Skemp & Sleik, La Crosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5717 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
by the City of La Crosse on the basis that the annexed property was not contiguous with the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18
by the City of La Crosse on the basis that the annexed property was not contiguous with the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of review to a subsequent interpretation of the statute, citing La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
of review to a subsequent interpretation of the statute, citing La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d 439, 446, 561 N.W.2d 686 (1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d 439, 446, 561 N.W.2d 686 (1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
WI 73
. For example, the Town of Campbell challenged the validity of its annexation by the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15
. For example, the Town of Campbell challenged the validity of its annexation by the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15