Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 6177 for cv-550.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 6177 for cv-550.
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2012
2000 12-31-11 550 480 403 564 1997 SUPREME COURT ACTIVITY Certifications
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92875 - 2013-02-11
2000 12-31-11 550 480 403 564 1997 SUPREME COURT ACTIVITY Certifications
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92875 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2011
Pending Cases: 12-31-11 550 480 403 564 1997 12-31-10 628 480 423 488 2019 District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78349 - 2014-09-15
Pending Cases: 12-31-11 550 480 403 564 1997 12-31-10 628 480 423 488 2019 District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78349 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2001
% Criminal 116 143 129 162 550 Percentage 47% 42% 37% 35% 39% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32 - 2017-09-20
% Criminal 116 143 129 162 550 Percentage 47% 42% 37% 35% 39% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32 - 2017-09-20
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2014
% 77% 14% 9% 80% 14% 6% 81% 14% 5% Per Curiams 174 100 *184 92 550 Signed Opinions 136 132 77 169
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
% 77% 14% 9% 80% 14% 6% 81% 14% 5% Per Curiams 174 100 *184 92 550 Signed Opinions 136 132 77 169
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2020
. Total Terminations 527 530 503 550 2110 Average terminations per judge† 132 133 168 110 132
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391847 - 2021-07-13
. Total Terminations 527 530 503 550 2110 Average terminations per judge† 132 133 168 110 132
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391847 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer - 2004AP002141
, 550 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1996). We give great deference to the trial court’s decision because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
, 550 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1996). We give great deference to the trial court’s decision because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
State v. Victor Merlin Hasel - 2009AP001213
that a different result would be reached at a new trial.” State v. Terrance J.W., 202 Wis. 2d 496, 501-02, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48357 - 2010-03-24
that a different result would be reached at a new trial.” State v. Terrance J.W., 202 Wis. 2d 496, 501-02, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48357 - 2010-03-24
Charlene S. Mertz v. Barbara Waldoch - 2007AP001525
. Bugher, 189 Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995). However, the doctrine does not apply to permissive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32256 - 2008-03-26
. Bugher, 189 Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995). However, the doctrine does not apply to permissive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32256 - 2008-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Victor Merlin Hasel - 2009AP001213
.” State v. Terrance J.W., 202 Wis. 2d 496, 501-02, 550 N.W.2d 445 (Ct. App. 1996). No. 2009AP1213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48357 - 2014-09-15
.” State v. Terrance J.W., 202 Wis. 2d 496, 501-02, 550 N.W.2d 445 (Ct. App. 1996). No. 2009AP1213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Larry M. Maize v. Daniel W. Blaedow - 2005AP002160
that justice be done in light of all the facts.’” Id. at 550 (quoting Bankers Mortgage Co. v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15
that justice be done in light of all the facts.’” Id. at 550 (quoting Bankers Mortgage Co. v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15