Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
08AP392 State v. Thomas R. Beninghaus.doc
that the officer [misled] the defendant.” Finally, it held that the officer’s statement—that it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
that the officer [misled] the defendant.” Finally, it held that the officer’s statement—that it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime. Supported by statements from the co-actors, the State initially took the position that Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
to a crime. Supported by statements from the co-actors, the State initially took the position that Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Geboy’s testimony as inconsistent with the earlier statements. In any event, he did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218750 - 2018-09-12
Geboy’s testimony as inconsistent with the earlier statements. In any event, he did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218750 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments; (5) the court’s decision to allow the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments; (5) the court’s decision to allow the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
State v. Randy L. Pralle
custodial statements and for not arguing that police should have tested Pralle’s hands for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
custodial statements and for not arguing that police should have tested Pralle’s hands for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
State v. Devontes D. Harris
that comments by the prosecution during jury selection, the defense in its opening statement and closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18848 - 2005-07-05
that comments by the prosecution during jury selection, the defense in its opening statement and closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18848 - 2005-07-05
State v. Walter W. Karnstein
and orally making two false statements while under oath. He also pled to disorderly conduct in sending e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5307 - 2005-03-31
and orally making two false statements while under oath. He also pled to disorderly conduct in sending e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5307 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose R.
impairment from smoking marijuana” did not affect “the voluntariness of his statement,” observing that “Jose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
impairment from smoking marijuana” did not affect “the voluntariness of his statement,” observing that “Jose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement was legally correct due to the applicable mandatory minimum sentences. The court also noted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
statement was legally correct due to the applicable mandatory minimum sentences. The court also noted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
State v. Henry Bloomfield
, this is my case, you had your case, and butt out.” Defense counsel argued that this statement tended to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31
, this is my case, you had your case, and butt out.” Defense counsel argued that this statement tended to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31