Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17771 - 17780 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17771 - 17780 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
“that the defendant was bragging about doing other armed robberies.” McCoy’s lawyer argued that those statements had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106316 - 2014-01-06
“that the defendant was bragging about doing other armed robberies.” McCoy’s lawyer argued that those statements had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106316 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
May 24 and 25, 1990 statements to police about the events surrounding the victim’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
May 24 and 25, 1990 statements to police about the events surrounding the victim’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and that Kelly had more heroin at his residence. The State argued that the statements of Brueser and Burwell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
and that Kelly had more heroin at his residence. The State argued that the statements of Brueser and Burwell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the assault and Morales’ incriminating statements thereafter. K.C. testified that, upon waking, Morales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738566 - 2023-12-13
the assault and Morales’ incriminating statements thereafter. K.C. testified that, upon waking, Morales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738566 - 2023-12-13
State v. Ronald Frank
examination and statements made during and immediately following that examination; and (3) the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17640 - 2005-04-11
examination and statements made during and immediately following that examination; and (3) the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17640 - 2005-04-11
Sylvester Rakowski v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
on Castro’s statements, and (2) whether Castro actually made statements that led Rakowski to believe his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14189 - 2005-03-31
on Castro’s statements, and (2) whether Castro actually made statements that led Rakowski to believe his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statements from his interview with police was granted in part and denied in part; the court excluded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
statements from his interview with police was granted in part and denied in part; the court excluded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
State v. Joseph J. H.
inconsistencies in Austin B.’s statements as well as prosecution witnesses. Fourth, the State did not meet its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31
inconsistencies in Austin B.’s statements as well as prosecution witnesses. Fourth, the State did not meet its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31
State v. Theodore D. Kraig
was not in evidence; that permitting certain statements by the district attorney during closing arguments constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
was not in evidence; that permitting certain statements by the district attorney during closing arguments constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to object to statements during the State’s closing arguments. We reject Glover’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21
to object to statements during the State’s closing arguments. We reject Glover’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21