Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 17471 - 17480 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Lisa B. v. William J.T., Sr.
, William, Sr. moved for a mistrial based on Smith’s statements. He argued that Smith improperly invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
, William, Sr. moved for a mistrial based on Smith’s statements. He argued that Smith improperly invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Fred J. Odell
on that. The prosecutor's statements explaining how and by whom Exhibit 4 was created are not evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9552 - 2017-09-19
on that. The prosecutor's statements explaining how and by whom Exhibit 4 was created are not evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
by failing to make a determination with respect to the voluntariness of his statement; and (5) determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
by failing to make a determination with respect to the voluntariness of his statement; and (5) determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lester Young
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
are not considered hearsay: Those subsections provide as follows: (4) STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15919 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tom Sweeney
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10020 - 2005-03-31
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10020 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tom Sweeney
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
a rambling statement to the court attempting to explain his conduct at the state office. Sweeney asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 219
, the statement that “not, in my mind, means zero” and the “yes” answer to the point-blank cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
, the statement that “not, in my mind, means zero” and the “yes” answer to the point-blank cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
suppression of Fields’ in-custody statement; and (3) sentencing. To address the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
statement made by the City during its rebuttal argument: The more likely event is that he actually went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11
statement made by the City during its rebuttal argument: The more likely event is that he actually went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s statement out of context, and a consideration of that context defeats Martin’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
the circuit court’s statement out of context, and a consideration of that context defeats Martin’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22