Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 14293 for probate.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 14293 for probate.
[PDF]
David Vega v. Labor and Industry Review Commission - 2021AP000024
placed on three years’ probation. Vega’s conditions of probation included serving ninety days in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
placed on three years’ probation. Vega’s conditions of probation included serving ninety days in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and ordered five years of probation. Miller’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
sentence and ordered five years of probation. Miller’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey M. Wesoloski - 1994AP002802
. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty days in the Monroe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty days in the Monroe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey M. Wesoloski - 1994AP002802
for misdemeanor battery. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8198 - 2005-03-31
for misdemeanor battery. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8198 - 2005-03-31
State v. Babette Davis - 1995AP001703
it failed to consider the option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
it failed to consider the option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis - 1995AP001703
the No. 95-1703-CR -2- option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
the No. 95-1703-CR -2- option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
State v. Choice W. E. - 1995AP001767
the probation officer that she did not know how Choice got to Beloit or who he stayed with on this occasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9276 - 2005-03-31
the probation officer that she did not know how Choice got to Beloit or who he stayed with on this occasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Choice W. E. - 1995AP001767
. Choice's mother informed the probation officer that she did not know how Choice got to Beloit or who he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
. Choice's mother informed the probation officer that she did not know how Choice got to Beloit or who he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary R. Malkmus - 2006AP000563
offense, the court withheld Malkmus’s sentence. The court placed Malkmus on probation for one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
offense, the court withheld Malkmus’s sentence. The court placed Malkmus on probation for one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Phillip M. Hudson - 2006AP002997
robbery in 2000. His sentence was withheld and he was placed on five years of probation. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31051 - 2014-09-15
robbery in 2000. His sentence was withheld and he was placed on five years of probation. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31051 - 2014-09-15