Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 38697 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Ryan T.S. - 2001AP000088
finger into the girl’s vagina. ¶5 Relying on Ryan’s statements to Zielke and Nyman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3486 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sean D. Patrick - 2012AP001118
4 circuit court relied on the prosecutor’s incorrect statement that he had a 1999 conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98003 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sean D. Patrick - 2012AP001118
that the circuit court relied on the prosecutor’s incorrect statement that he had a 1999 conviction for robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98003 - 2013-06-10

State v. Adam J. Ebert - 2013AP002403
the circuit court erred in denying Ebert’s motion to suppress his statements to police. With respect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108309 - 2014-02-25

[PDF] State v. Daniel Patrick Pickett - 2017AP000664
trial counsel should have sought to suppress Pickett’s statement to police or pursued an NGI plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248569 - 2019-10-09

[PDF] Kenneth Jaworski v. David Schwarz - 2013AP000506
requirements. WISCONSIN STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) requires the brief to contain a statement of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107662 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lawrence Harris v. Michael Meisner - 2015AP001385
a statement in his defense. The hearing officer denied the request based upon the recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170190 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ryan T.S. - 2001AP000088
inserted his finger into the girl’s vagina. ¶5 Relying on Ryan’s statements to Zielke and Nyman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3486 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kurt W. Meyer - 2002AP002694
was ineffective by failing to object to a statement by the prosecutor during closing argument that referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31

Nadine M. Butler v. Robert A. Butler - 2001AP001775
was irretrievably broken. Based upon the facts and circumstances, along with Nadine’s testimony and the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4136 - 2005-03-31