Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Jason R. Dixon
of fracture and she was given a prescription of vicodin for the pain. In her Victim Impact Statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5327 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jason R. Dixon
of fracture and she was given a prescription of vicodin for the pain. In her Victim Impact Statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5328 - 2017-09-19

State v. John D. Williams
knew about Williams’s character. Thus, her statement a short while later, that the PSI writer has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2313 - 2005-03-31

WI App 105 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2298-CR Complete Titl...
, and also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Conner argues that statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86047 - 2012-09-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) the prosecutor made improper statements during closing argument; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
deficient performance. For example, relevant to VanCuick’s decision not to object to certain statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
treatment of limited liability companies.” The guidance contained the following pertinent statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340048 - 2021-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
period of one year. Each of the six purchase contracts contained the following statement in Section 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196796 - 2017-09-26

[PDF] State v. John D. Williams
based on what she now knew about Williams’s character. Thus, her statement a short while later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2313 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
) the prosecutor made improper statements during closing argument; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03