Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. James Jagodinsky
applies, he argues that this statement is dicta because the Lopez panel never reached the second Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
applies, he argues that this statement is dicta because the Lopez panel never reached the second Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing and determined that Jackson’s statements to the police were admissible because the police gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
a hearing and determined that Jackson’s statements to the police were admissible because the police gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
Lloyd DeJong v. Gerald Hoornstra
was not a party. In addition, Hoornstra argues that the trial court erred by admitting statements attributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14530 - 2005-03-31
was not a party. In addition, Hoornstra argues that the trial court erred by admitting statements attributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14530 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of that statement, arguing he was never allowed to litigate certain issues because the case had been appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
of that statement, arguing he was never allowed to litigate certain issues because the case had been appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Davies
revealed no evidence of physical injury or sexual assault. He further cites to a victim impact statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21
revealed no evidence of physical injury or sexual assault. He further cites to a victim impact statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statements do not render testimony incredible or patently misleading. See State v. Daniels, 117 Wis. 2d 9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154328 - 2017-09-21
statements do not render testimony incredible or patently misleading. See State v. Daniels, 117 Wis. 2d 9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154328 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Martin J. McGlone
and procedural and private property rights.” Third, McGlone asserts that false and misleading statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15556 - 2017-09-21
and procedural and private property rights.” Third, McGlone asserts that false and misleading statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15556 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
address whether the circuit court properly denied Johnson’s motion to suppress the statement he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95985 - 2013-04-23
address whether the circuit court properly denied Johnson’s motion to suppress the statement he made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95985 - 2013-04-23