Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1681 - 1690 of 63340 for b's.

[PDF] State v. Clyde B. Williams - 1998AP003338
-APPELLANT, V. CLYDE B. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14806 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Garcia - 2006AP002985
conviction does not comply with WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b). We agree and reverse on this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30404 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel J. Garcia - 2006AP002985
disorderly conduct conviction does not comply with Wis. Stat. § 973.01(2)(b). We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30404 - 2007-09-26

[PDF] Wind Point Restoration, Inc. v. Anne Weikel - 2018AP002258
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II WIND POINT RESTORATION, INC. D/B/A SERVPRO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294847 - 2020-10-14

Darnell Cauley v. Ponderosa Steak House - 1998AP001176
to § 799.207(2)(b), Stats., but subsequently withdrew this demand and asked that judgment be entered consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Darnell Cauley v. Ponderosa Steak House - 1998AP001176
2 the circuit court pursuant to § 799.207(2)(b), STATS., but subsequently withdrew this demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13932 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Pedro A. Lopez - 2010AP000945
)(b),2 rather than the best interest standard under WIS. STAT. § 767.41(5). Lopez also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73910 - 2014-09-15

Ruth B. Corddry v. Steven F. Berg - 2011AP000621
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I Ruth B. Corddry, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17

[PDF] Ruth B. Corddry v. Steven F. Berg - 2011AP000621
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I RUTH B. CORDDRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15

Oneida County Dept. of Social Services v. Nicole W. - 2008AP002330
); [and] (b) That, within 3 years prior to the date the court adjudged the child to be in need of protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35966 - 2009-03-22