Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16401 - 16410 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16401 - 16410 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Ronald Keith
as “unavailable” when the witness is “absent from the hearing and the proponent of [his] statement has been unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11268 - 2005-03-31
as “unavailable” when the witness is “absent from the hearing and the proponent of [his] statement has been unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11268 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
speculation. We hold, therefore, that the court erroneously concluded that the statements offered in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17821 - 2017-09-21
speculation. We hold, therefore, that the court erroneously concluded that the statements offered in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” element of OWI. We assume without deciding that the court’s statements constituted error, but conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
” element of OWI. We assume without deciding that the court’s statements constituted error, but conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 124
on venue because one obstruction charge was based on statements Schultz made in a different county. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53280 - 2014-09-15
on venue because one obstruction charge was based on statements Schultz made in a different county. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53280 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly M.H.
prejudicial effect. The lengthy probable cause statement in the State’s CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11963 - 2005-03-31
prejudicial effect. The lengthy probable cause statement in the State’s CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11963 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
included A.B.’s testimony and recorded statements from a forensic interview, testimony from the forensic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
included A.B.’s testimony and recorded statements from a forensic interview, testimony from the forensic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Jones asserts that trial counsel “promised” in her opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109391 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Jones asserts that trial counsel “promised” in her opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109391 - 2017-09-21
State v. Levi Booth
made certain statements to police regarding her knowledge of the retaliatory shooting plot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
made certain statements to police regarding her knowledge of the retaliatory shooting plot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard R. Avery
. Kraft testified Roby never made such a statement, and that she certainly would have wanted the guns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21746 - 2006-03-13
. Kraft testified Roby never made such a statement, and that she certainly would have wanted the guns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21746 - 2006-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the “operation” element of OWI. We assume without deciding that the court’s statements constituted error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135550 - 2015-02-24
the “operation” element of OWI. We assume without deciding that the court’s statements constituted error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135550 - 2015-02-24