Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 68445 for did.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 68445 for did.
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristina L. Vogt
counsel was ineffective in three respects: (1) counsel did not take steps to enable Vogt to receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
counsel was ineffective in three respects: (1) counsel did not take steps to enable Vogt to receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marion Wilson v. Clarence L. Ogilvie
acres of land she had conveyed to Ogilvie. The trial court found that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14647 - 2017-09-21
acres of land she had conveyed to Ogilvie. The trial court found that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if she did not agree, he would have her prosecuted for various crimes and that she would be arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
that, if she did not agree, he would have her prosecuted for various crimes and that she would be arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
improperly excluded evidence, did not allow him to explain the relevance of certain evidence, and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36761 - 2014-09-15
improperly excluded evidence, did not allow him to explain the relevance of certain evidence, and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36761 - 2014-09-15
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
Robert Ruffer v. Town of Monroe - Board of Review
of our certiorari review, we consider the dispositive issues to be that Ruffer did not ask the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
of our certiorari review, we consider the dispositive issues to be that Ruffer did not ask the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence, did not allow him to explain the relevance of certain evidence, and did not conclude that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36761 - 2009-06-10
evidence, did not allow him to explain the relevance of certain evidence, and did not conclude that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36761 - 2009-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
breath test, the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest her for violating ยง 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41938 - 2014-09-15
breath test, the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest her for violating ยง 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41938 - 2014-09-15
Marion Wilson v. Clarence L. Ogilvie
that the parties did not intend to sever the two acres from Wilson's remaining acreage. The court also determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14647 - 2005-03-31
that the parties did not intend to sever the two acres from Wilson's remaining acreage. The court also determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14647 - 2005-03-31