Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 38697 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 38697 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Michele Sommerfeldt v. Donald C. G. Pagel - 2002AP000170
made these statements. However, we conclude that the finding is supported by Sommerfeldt’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4851 - 2017-09-19
made these statements. However, we conclude that the finding is supported by Sommerfeldt’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4851 - 2017-09-19
Michele Sommerfeldt v. Donald C. G. Pagel - 2002AP000170
to support the finding that he made these statements. However, we conclude that the finding is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4851 - 2005-03-31
to support the finding that he made these statements. However, we conclude that the finding is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4851 - 2005-03-31
State v. David E. Rusch - 1996AP002868
assistance of counsel; because the comments of the prosecutor in voir dire, opening and closing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel; because the comments of the prosecutor in voir dire, opening and closing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11527 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary Robert Petersen - 2021AP001097
to her grandmother, had made an untruthful allegation of sexual assault was Denise’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552335 - 2022-08-09
to her grandmother, had made an untruthful allegation of sexual assault was Denise’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552335 - 2022-08-09
State v. John Norman - 2001AP003303
statement for purposes of impeachment. The court of appeals held that the error in excluding the prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16574 - 2005-03-31
statement for purposes of impeachment. The court of appeals held that the error in excluding the prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Norman - 2001AP003303
statement for purposes of impeachment. The court of appeals held that the error in excluding the prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16574 - 2017-09-21
statement for purposes of impeachment. The court of appeals held that the error in excluding the prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kelley L. Hauk - 2001AP001668
interviewed Guevara, and wrote Nos. 01-1668-CR 01-1669-CR 3 out a statement that Guevara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4096 - 2017-09-20
interviewed Guevara, and wrote Nos. 01-1668-CR 01-1669-CR 3 out a statement that Guevara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4096 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kelley L. Hauk - 2001AP001669
interviewed Guevara, and wrote Nos. 01-1668-CR 01-1669-CR 3 out a statement that Guevara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4097 - 2017-09-20
interviewed Guevara, and wrote Nos. 01-1668-CR 01-1669-CR 3 out a statement that Guevara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4097 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. J.D.J. - 2022AP001138
(and the number of convictions) for impeachment purposes and to offer expert testimony on statements written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
(and the number of convictions) for impeachment purposes and to offer expert testimony on statements written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
State v. Shawn Odell Brooks - 2009AP000310
to the victim. In addition, one of the officers obtained a statement that incriminated Brooks from Startisha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48812 - 2010-04-07
to the victim. In addition, one of the officers obtained a statement that incriminated Brooks from Startisha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48812 - 2010-04-07