Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 20758 for warrants.
Search results 161 - 170 of 20758 for warrants.
State v. Christopher E. Konkol - 2007AP000469
warrant existed. Konkol therefore argues the marijuana he dropped after he was seized should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
warrant existed. Konkol therefore argues the marijuana he dropped after he was seized should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann - 1999AP000589
the warrant under which his apartment was later searched. On cross-appeal, Herrmann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15213 - 2017-09-21
the warrant under which his apartment was later searched. On cross-appeal, Herrmann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15213 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann - 1999AP000325
the warrant under which his apartment was later searched. On cross-appeal, Herrmann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15096 - 2017-09-21
the warrant under which his apartment was later searched. On cross-appeal, Herrmann argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15096 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Tarkenton - 2022AP000740
and that the deputy believed that there was an “active warrant” for Tarkenton. At 5:50 p.m., the officers arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
and that the deputy believed that there was an “active warrant” for Tarkenton. At 5:50 p.m., the officers arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
State v. Shirlene Davis - 1999AP002537
of a no-knock execution of a search warrant.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 A court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31
of a no-knock execution of a search warrant.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2 A court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mack E. Scott - 2015AP001326
should have granted his motion to suppress evidence because the police’s search warrant was invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173683 - 2017-09-21
should have granted his motion to suppress evidence because the police’s search warrant was invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173683 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt - 2001AP000065
seized pursuant to a search warrant for his home; (2) denying his request for a Franks[1] hearing; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3477 - 2005-03-31
seized pursuant to a search warrant for his home; (2) denying his request for a Franks[1] hearing; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt - 2001AP000065
(1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant for his home; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3477 - 2017-09-20
(1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant for his home; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3477 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Meier Williams - 2010AP001551
search warrants. Although WIS. STAT. § 757.69(1)(b)1 appears to grant that power to court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67967 - 2014-09-15
search warrants. Although WIS. STAT. § 757.69(1)(b)1 appears to grant that power to court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67967 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lila Claire Rudawski - 2018AP000539
sweep. The officers sought a warrant to search the “[s]ingle family dwelling … and persons and motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245266 - 2019-08-20
sweep. The officers sought a warrant to search the “[s]ingle family dwelling … and persons and motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245266 - 2019-08-20