Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. John Warren
.” Beyond this statement, the trial court inquired no further into Warren’s reasons for requesting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
.” Beyond this statement, the trial court inquired no further into Warren’s reasons for requesting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane E. Elm
. Because we conclude the physician's statement was admissible opinion testimony and Elm was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
. Because we conclude the physician's statement was admissible opinion testimony and Elm was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harry S. Bernstein
statement waiving his statutory right to a jury trial. Bernstein also makes the additional arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
statement waiving his statutory right to a jury trial. Bernstein also makes the additional arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, instructing her to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133339 - 2017-09-21
, instructing her to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133339 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement to the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133339 - 2015-01-26
to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement to the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133339 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the sentencing hearing, and statements made by defense counsel, to determine whether the defendant has agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
, the sentencing hearing, and statements made by defense counsel, to determine whether the defendant has agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress the custodial statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85498 - 2012-07-31
motion to suppress the custodial statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85498 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We disagree with each claim and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85498 - 2014-09-15
statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We disagree with each claim and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
mitigation evidence and to object to an unduly prejudicial victim impact statement. None of his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34510 - 2014-09-15
mitigation evidence and to object to an unduly prejudicial victim impact statement. None of his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34510 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31