Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15811 - 15820 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15811 - 15820 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
WI APP 89
to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006); Crawford v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84628 - 2014-09-15
to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006); Crawford v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84628 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
He challenges the admission of a statement obtained from his wife in alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94101 - 2014-09-15
He challenges the admission of a statement obtained from his wife in alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94101 - 2014-09-15
State v. David R. Olofson
evidence and statements made during the search. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
evidence and statements made during the search. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
WI APP 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2363-CR 2010AP2364-CR ...
] The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28
] The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
: [Bolden’s] argument ignores a very significant piece of overlapping evidence in both cases: [his] statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29720 - 2007-07-16
: [Bolden’s] argument ignores a very significant piece of overlapping evidence in both cases: [his] statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29720 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 In her opening statement, the prosecutor told the jurors to pay attention to what Metz told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 In her opening statement, the prosecutor told the jurors to pay attention to what Metz told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording is not produced at trial. ¶3 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60902 - 2011-03-15
a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording is not produced at trial. ¶3 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60902 - 2011-03-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
discipline, (3) object to hearsay testimony; (4) object to the Department’s closing statement arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33877 - 2014-09-15
discipline, (3) object to hearsay testimony; (4) object to the Department’s closing statement arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33877 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Thomas
.” In pretrial proceedings, the trial court had ruled that this hearsay statement was inadmissible at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16169 - 2017-09-21
.” In pretrial proceedings, the trial court had ruled that this hearsay statement was inadmissible at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
this restitution rolling. Paget admitted making this statement but still insisted he never had any money from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16552 - 2017-09-21
this restitution rolling. Paget admitted making this statement but still insisted he never had any money from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16552 - 2017-09-21