Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15601 - 15610 of 56131 for n y c.
Search results 15601 - 15610 of 56131 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. John Allen
for the motion," Wis. Stat. § 971.30(2)(c) (2001-02), and must provide a "good faith argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16673 - 2017-09-21
for the motion," Wis. Stat. § 971.30(2)(c) (2001-02), and must provide a "good faith argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently moved the circuit court for “[c]larification as to whether [his] maintenance obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246180 - 2019-09-04
subsequently moved the circuit court for “[c]larification as to whether [his] maintenance obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246180 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
energy harvester.” Like the 2011 article, the 2012 application described “[a]n apparatus comprising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999289 - 2025-08-21
energy harvester.” Like the 2011 article, the 2012 application described “[a]n apparatus comprising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999289 - 2025-08-21
2010 WI APP 147
the authority under Wis. Stat. § 804.12(4)(c) and (d) to impose the sanction they seek and erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55515 - 2010-11-16
the authority under Wis. Stat. § 804.12(4)(c) and (d) to impose the sanction they seek and erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55515 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of ...
on the first element. Id., ¶16 & n.4. The jury answered the verdict question “yes,” and the court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47300 - 2010-02-23
on the first element. Id., ¶16 & n.4. The jury answered the verdict question “yes,” and the court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47300 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
WI App 38
of the Project on the “quality of the human environment.” See WIS. STAT. § 1.11(2)(c). A draft of the EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213491 - 2018-07-12
of the Project on the “quality of the human environment.” See WIS. STAT. § 1.11(2)(c). A draft of the EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213491 - 2018-07-12
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence A. Williams
, Defendant-Respondent. State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Antwon C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21
, Defendant-Respondent. State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Antwon C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stanley W. Anderson v. The Regents of the University of California
the cause was submitted on the brief of Richard C. Ninneman, Donald K. Schott, and Jeffrey O. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8642 - 2017-09-19
the cause was submitted on the brief of Richard C. Ninneman, Donald K. Schott, and Jeffrey O. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8642 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is before this court on certification
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79240 - 2012-03-06
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is before this court on certification
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79240 - 2012-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in § 48.977(4)(c)1. ¶14 Within thirty days of filing of the petition, the court must hold a “plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21
in § 48.977(4)(c)1. ¶14 Within thirty days of filing of the petition, the court must hold a “plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21