Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 63340 for b's.

[PDF] State v. Mitchell L. Christen - 2019AP001767
the influence of an intoxicant, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 941.20(1)(b). Christen argued in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256684 - 2020-03-17

[PDF] Kenosha County DHS v. Lakesha B. O. - 2013AP002646
Brenda J. Dahl Brenda Dahl Law Offices 620 56th Street Kenosha, WI 53140 Lakesha B. O. 1341
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107338 - 2017-09-21

June Unpublished Orders
2005AP002658 State v. Larry B. Hooker 2005AP002784 St. Joseph'sHospital v. John W. Kilty State v. Eddie C
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29538 - 2007-06-27

[PDF] State v. John C. Schroeder - 1998AP002620
blood alcohol content (BAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), STATS.; however, a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14481 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeremy J. Ramirez - 2003AP000957
to jail after a stay of sentence, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 946.425(1m)(b) (2001-02). 1 He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6360 - 2017-09-19

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael R. Inglimo - 2005AP000718
a violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).[3] The referee acknowledged that using marijuana is a crime under Wisconsin law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30663 - 2007-10-17

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael R. Inglimo - 2005AP000718
The referee concluded that this conduct by Attorney Inglimo constituted a violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30663 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Barron County Department of Health and Human Services v. S. R. T. - 2018AP001574
in the Court granting the [TPR petition] by default. Further, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.23(2)(b)3., [Simon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241053 - 2019-05-22

Richard Schaul v. Jeff Kordell - 2008AP002571
. § 46.90 (2003-04).[1] Kordell counterclaimed based on § 46.90(4)(b)1.a. and (4)(c) which prohibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37986 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] Richard Schaul v. Jeff Kordell - 2008AP002571
based on § 46.90(4)(b)1.a. and (4)(c) which prohibit retaliation against anyone who has made a good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37986 - 2014-09-15