Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1541 - 1550 of 20758 for warrants.
Search results 1541 - 1550 of 20758 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Scott K. Schaefer - 1995AP002878
facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (quoted source omitted). It is an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9840 - 2017-09-19
facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (quoted source omitted). It is an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9840 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott K. Schaefer - 1995AP002878
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Thomas Morton, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee - 2009AP001198
if: (a) The seizure is incident to an arrest or a search under a search warrant … …. (continued) 3 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
if: (a) The seizure is incident to an arrest or a search under a search warrant … …. (continued) 3 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr. - 1996AP001010
sentence modification, claiming that a new factor warranted modification of the previously imposed sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10657 - 2005-03-31
sentence modification, claiming that a new factor warranted modification of the previously imposed sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr. - 1996AP001010
that a new factor warranted modification of the previously imposed sentence. Burke proffered that the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
that a new factor warranted modification of the previously imposed sentence. Burke proffered that the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Tony C. Witz - 2017AP001729
informed Schroeder that Witz had an open felony arrest warrant and that Witz had six prior operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214418 - 2018-06-20
informed Schroeder that Witz had an open felony arrest warrant and that Witz had six prior operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214418 - 2018-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Navdeep S. Brar - 2015AP001261
was required to obtain a warrant. The circuit court denied Brar's motion and found that Brar had consented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192412 - 2017-09-27
was required to obtain a warrant. The circuit court denied Brar's motion and found that Brar had consented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192412 - 2017-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Willie Cooper - 2005AP002337
. No. 2005AP2337-CR 3 warrant, and none of the exceptions to the prohibition against nonconsensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25111 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP2337-CR 3 warrant, and none of the exceptions to the prohibition against nonconsensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25111 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie Cooper - 2005AP002337
he did not consent, the officers did not have a warrant, and none of the exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25111 - 2006-05-10
he did not consent, the officers did not have a warrant, and none of the exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25111 - 2006-05-10
State v. Andrew James Garner - 1996AP000168
that it was “insufficient to warrant a hearing.” The court explained that a hearing is “not supposed to be a discovery tool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
that it was “insufficient to warrant a hearing.” The court explained that a hearing is “not supposed to be a discovery tool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31