Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1541 - 1550 of 51054 for address.
Search results 1541 - 1550 of 51054 for address.
Dane County v. Roric A. Gibbs - 2012AP002589
, which addresses “court costs, fees, and surcharges.” I read his brief as arguing that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94975 - 2013-04-03
, which addresses “court costs, fees, and surcharges.” I read his brief as arguing that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94975 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
Town of Grafton v. City of Cedarburg - 2005AP002710
for summary judgment. ¶4 We first address the Town’s request that the conveyances and annexation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25814 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment. ¶4 We first address the Town’s request that the conveyances and annexation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25814 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Preisler - 2022AP001019
, consecutive to an existing prison sentence. The victim addressed the court at sentencing, and Preisler
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
, consecutive to an existing prison sentence. The victim addressed the court at sentencing, and Preisler
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Ronald E. Wright - 2018AP000149
. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Wright did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241339 - 2019-05-28
. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Wright did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241339 - 2019-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Andrew Davies - 2013AP001694
. RULE 809.32; Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134232 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.32; Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Levelt Dewarren Musgraves - 2020AP002089
of Musgraves’s sentence. The circuit court did not address Musgraves’s claim about the Public Interest Justice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
of Musgraves’s sentence. The circuit court did not address Musgraves’s claim about the Public Interest Justice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Michael K. Wolf, Jr. - 2019AP001189
Wolf’s operating license for twelve months. The no-merit report first addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311443 - 2020-12-08
Wolf’s operating license for twelve months. The no-merit report first addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311443 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
State v. Zachary J. Deyo - 2013AP001805
). The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to: (1) a claim of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131743 - 2017-09-21
). The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to: (1) a claim of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131743 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jay E. Higbie - 2017AP000422
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to Higbie’s pleas or sentencing. Higbie
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to Higbie’s pleas or sentencing. Higbie
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
[PDF]
State v. Roger Clarence Nichols - 2018AP000507
an evidentiary hearing and denied the motion. The no-merit report addresses whether the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05
an evidentiary hearing and denied the motion. The no-merit report addresses whether the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05