Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 39990 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 39990 for financial disclosure statement.
Annette Slocum v. Robert Parsley
. The court found that the assault and Robert's subsequent statement satisfied the grounds for a harassment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7975 - 2005-03-31
. The court found that the assault and Robert's subsequent statement satisfied the grounds for a harassment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat in the face of a corrections officer. He was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14336 - 2014-09-15
that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat in the face of a corrections officer. He was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14336 - 2014-09-15
State v. Amy D. Zietlow
of extended supervision. On appeal, Zietlow argues that two statements by the court about her character were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
of extended supervision. On appeal, Zietlow argues that two statements by the court about her character were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
decision. We affirm. The conduct report alleged that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
decision. We affirm. The conduct report alleged that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amy D. Zietlow
statements by the court about her character were not supported by the record. Considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6432 - 2017-09-19
statements by the court about her character were not supported by the record. Considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6432 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) his convictions violate the First Amendment because the statements that support his convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95337 - 2013-04-10
) his convictions violate the First Amendment because the statements that support his convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95337 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that he was deprived of a fair sentencing hearing because of statements made by the victim’s family. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84112 - 2014-09-15
and that he was deprived of a fair sentencing hearing because of statements made by the victim’s family. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84112 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel Buttner
court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence relating to an oral statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14237 - 2005-03-31
court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence relating to an oral statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14237 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel R. Buttner
court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence relating to an oral statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14077 - 2005-03-31
court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence relating to an oral statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to convince her to change her statement and minimize his actions. Katie further testified that as a result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593041 - 2022-11-22
to convince her to change her statement and minimize his actions. Katie further testified that as a result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593041 - 2022-11-22