Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Jerry D. Butler - 2015AP001537
conflicting statements concerning transcripts. In one document entitled “Statement on Transcript” file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160073 - 2017-09-21
conflicting statements concerning transcripts. In one document entitled “Statement on Transcript” file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160073 - 2017-09-21
State v. Victor Delvalle - 2006AP000749
the taped excerpts as prior consistent statements to rebut the charge of recent fabrication or improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28686 - 2007-04-11
the taped excerpts as prior consistent statements to rebut the charge of recent fabrication or improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28686 - 2007-04-11
[PDF]
State v. Sean P. Tate - 2001AP002180
-six hours after his arrest, while in custody, Tate gave the police inculpatory statements. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4296 - 2017-09-19
-six hours after his arrest, while in custody, Tate gave the police inculpatory statements. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4296 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gina M. Schefsky - 2006AP001942
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State appeals from an order suppressing statements made by Gina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29085 - 2014-09-15
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State appeals from an order suppressing statements made by Gina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29085 - 2014-09-15
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer - 2004AP002141
conclude that Phiffer was not prejudiced by any of the statements to which he objects, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
conclude that Phiffer was not prejudiced by any of the statements to which he objects, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
State v. Gina M. Schefsky - 2006AP001942
. The State appeals from an order suppressing statements made by Gina Schefsky, a daycare worker charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29085 - 2007-05-22
. The State appeals from an order suppressing statements made by Gina Schefsky, a daycare worker charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29085 - 2007-05-22
State v. Thomas C. Nelson - 1996AP000206
the victim's written statement. Nelson's trial attorney was present during this reading and conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10289 - 2005-03-31
the victim's written statement. Nelson's trial attorney was present during this reading and conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10289 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas C. Nelson - 1996AP000205
the victim's written statement. Nelson's trial attorney was present during this reading and conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10288 - 2005-03-31
the victim's written statement. Nelson's trial attorney was present during this reading and conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10288 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence C. Pitcher - 1997AP001112
question. These positions are without merit. Because the statements in question were not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12366 - 2005-03-31
question. These positions are without merit. Because the statements in question were not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence C. Pitcher - 1997AP001112
the statements in question were not subject to the suppression order and the trial NO. 97-1112 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12366 - 2017-09-21
the statements in question were not subject to the suppression order and the trial NO. 97-1112 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12366 - 2017-09-21