Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1401 - 1410 of 20758 for warrants.

State v. Christine M. Hill - 1997AP002652
measured against the time needed to obtain a warrant, would constitute the exigent circumstances required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13007 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Traci L. Kollross - 2018AP000931
commenced when a warrant or summons is issued, an indictment is found, or an information is filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240942 - 2019-07-09

[PDF] State v. Dennis E. Mutters - 2022AP000734
, including evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant for Mutters’ cell phone and laptop. Mutters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714757 - 2023-10-18

State v. Cory L. Alexander - 2012AP001456
to trial, Alexander moved to quash a search warrant for his house in order to suppress the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10

[PDF] State v. Matthew Robert Watts - 2020AP000764
a material witness warrant. On the second day of trial, Tammy did not appear. Police were not able
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344223 - 2021-03-10

State v. James C. Koepp - 1996AP003561
court should have recognized these problems as a “new factor” warranting sentence modification. Koepp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11833 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James C. Koepp - 1996AP003561
should have recognized these problems as a NO. 96-3561-CR 2 “new factor” warranting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lamont Elliot Moore - 2016AP001014
denying his claim that a new factor warrants modification of his life sentence. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21

State v. Adam K. Day - 2011AP002872
motion sought to suppress evidence seized from Day’s home on the grounds that the search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93808 - 2013-03-04

[PDF] State v. Eugene A. Pagois - 1995AP001511
court determined that the instruction was No. 95-1511-CR -5- not warranted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19