Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13761 - 13770 of 40073 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13761 - 13770 of 40073 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth J. Seely
, the State sought to admit into evidence the victim’s July 15, 1999 statement to a co- worker that Seely had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3382 - 2017-09-19
, the State sought to admit into evidence the victim’s July 15, 1999 statement to a co- worker that Seely had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3382 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward H.
by failing to object to an inadmissible hearsay statement made by his brother to a police detective that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4994 - 2017-09-19
by failing to object to an inadmissible hearsay statement made by his brother to a police detective that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” was filed against him based on false statements by Schaffrath and McClyman. 1 A copy of the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
” was filed against him based on false statements by Schaffrath and McClyman. 1 A copy of the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 The charges against Hicks stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63464 - 2011-05-02
a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 The charges against Hicks stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63464 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
statement to police was custodial and involuntary. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Beth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34704 - 2008-11-24
statement to police was custodial and involuntary. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Beth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34704 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Craig gave several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70796 - 2014-09-15
Craig gave several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70796 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) by not objecting to a detective’s testimony about a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
) by not objecting to a detective’s testimony about a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
English language version of his statement, which Dotel signed. ¶3 Dotel moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2009-04-28
English language version of his statement, which Dotel signed. ¶3 Dotel moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2009-04-28
Frontsheet
, the Honorable Mark Mangerson presiding.[1] ¶2 At issue in this case is the admissibility of statements made
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
, the Honorable Mark Mangerson presiding.[1] ¶2 At issue in this case is the admissibility of statements made
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08