Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13561 - 13570 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13561 - 13570 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Chaunte Ott
instruction; (3) that the trial court erroneously admitted a prior consistent statement as an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
instruction; (3) that the trial court erroneously admitted a prior consistent statement as an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that was verified through Detective Baures.” In a subsequent statement to law enforcement, Summers denied being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191928 - 2017-09-21
that was verified through Detective Baures.” In a subsequent statement to law enforcement, Summers denied being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191928 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
and a statement made by the prosecutor in the presence of the jury. We reject Kenyon’s arguments and affirm his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13075 - 2005-03-31
and a statement made by the prosecutor in the presence of the jury. We reject Kenyon’s arguments and affirm his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
curative instructions given by the trial court and a statement made by the No. 97-2835-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
curative instructions given by the trial court and a statement made by the No. 97-2835-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James A. Johnson
recognized that the information was prejudicial, but concluded that the portion of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
recognized that the information was prejudicial, but concluded that the portion of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in his supplemental motion and made some additional statements. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31385 - 2008-01-07
in his supplemental motion and made some additional statements. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31385 - 2008-01-07
State v. James A. Johnson
that the information was prejudicial, but concluded that the portion of the statement concerning Johnson's parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
that the information was prejudicial, but concluded that the portion of the statement concerning Johnson's parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
additional statements. The circuit court found that the statements were No. 2007AP48-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31385 - 2014-09-15
additional statements. The circuit court found that the statements were No. 2007AP48-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31385 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terrance C. Harris
court erred in admitting his statement because it was involuntary; (2) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13441 - 2017-09-21
court erred in admitting his statement because it was involuntary; (2) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terrance C. Harris
court erred in admitting his statement because it was involuntary; (2) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13602 - 2017-09-21
court erred in admitting his statement because it was involuntary; (2) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13602 - 2017-09-21