Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13561 - 13570 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. London Mack Stewart - 2012AP001457
court received, without objection from Stewart, both oral and written impact statements from both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97910 - 2017-09-21

State v. London Mack Stewart - 2012AP001457
statements from both Officers Jekanoski and Justus. Both officers told the court that they wanted Stewart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97910 - 2014-03-09

[PDF] State v. Tudi Montejano - 2017AP002077
statements to police on the basis that he was threatened by them to lie and say that he was selling drugs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235910 - 2019-02-22

[PDF] State v. Raul M. Mendoza - 2012AP001401
. Trial counsel filed a motion to suppress statements, alleging that Mendoza’s custodial statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94285 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dwayne G. Thomas v. Daniel Buchler - 2007AP001412
statements from seven separate confidential informants (CIs) who identified Thomas as having participated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32518 - 2014-09-15

State v. Felipe R. Domenech - 2004AP002357
statement into evidence. ¶3 The jury found him guilty of both charges and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18810 - 2005-06-29

[PDF] State v. Felipe R. Domenech - 2004AP002357
, but he said one of those things. The State also introduced Domenech’s transcribed statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James D. Miller - 2000AP002779
that the detective’s statement was essentially opinion testimony by the detective that Miller’s conduct did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19

State v. James D. Miller - 2000AP002779
was going to believe the shooting was justified. Miller argues that the detective’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3137 - 2005-03-31

Jay Wicke v. Labor and Industry Review Commission - 2004AP002914
in his emergency room medical report, and that the statements in the report attributed to Wicke were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18184 - 2005-05-16