Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Marcus A. Hicks - 2010AP001316
a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 The charges against Hicks stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63464 - 2011-05-02
a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 The charges against Hicks stem from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63464 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Marcus A. Hicks - 2010AP001316
) by not objecting to a detective’s testimony about a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
) by not objecting to a detective’s testimony about a victim’s prior statement. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jose Dotel - 2005AP001635
English language version of his statement, which Dotel signed. ¶3 Dotel moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13
English language version of his statement, which Dotel signed. ¶3 Dotel moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Edward H. - 2002AP000565
by failing to object to an inadmissible hearsay statement made by his brother to a police detective that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4994 - 2017-09-19
by failing to object to an inadmissible hearsay statement made by his brother to a police detective that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth J. Seely - 2000AP003366
, the State sought to admit into evidence the victim’s July 15, 1999 statement to a co- worker that Seely had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3382 - 2017-09-19
, the State sought to admit into evidence the victim’s July 15, 1999 statement to a co- worker that Seely had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3382 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David A. Damon - 2008AP002721
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ricco J. Craig - 2010AP002541
several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement. The State played
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70796 - 2011-09-12
several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement. The State played
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70796 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Ricco J. Craig - 2010AP002541
Craig gave several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70796 - 2014-09-15
Craig gave several custodial statements, and the police made an audio recording of each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70796 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
MADCAP I, LLC v. Brad McNamee - 2004AP002045
of that statute because the challenged website statements were merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18391 - 2017-09-21
of that statute because the challenged website statements were merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18391 - 2017-09-21
MADCAP I, LLC v. Brad McNamee - 2004AP002045
of a misrepresentation within the meaning of that statute because the challenged website statements were merely puffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18391 - 2005-07-26
of a misrepresentation within the meaning of that statute because the challenged website statements were merely puffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18391 - 2005-07-26