Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13501 - 13510 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13501 - 13510 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
may have included exculpatory statements. See id. (“Upon demand, the district attorney shall, within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49294 - 2015-04-08
may have included exculpatory statements. See id. (“Upon demand, the district attorney shall, within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49294 - 2015-04-08
State v. Antonio L. Ford
a witness on a prior inconsistent statement under 906.13(2).” The court excluded both the photos themselves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
a witness on a prior inconsistent statement under 906.13(2).” The court excluded both the photos themselves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Grover
and is clinically depressed. She also stated she “was pretty out of it” when she gave her statement to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18178 - 2017-09-21
and is clinically depressed. She also stated she “was pretty out of it” when she gave her statement to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. The State appeals from an order partially suppressing a statement Brandon Sturm gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27597 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. The State appeals from an order partially suppressing a statement Brandon Sturm gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Antonio L. Ford
evidence to impeach a witness on a prior inconsistent statement under 906.13(2).” The court excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
evidence to impeach a witness on a prior inconsistent statement under 906.13(2).” The court excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. The State appeals from an order partially suppressing a statement Brandon Sturm gave to police because Sturm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27597 - 2006-12-26
. The State appeals from an order partially suppressing a statement Brandon Sturm gave to police because Sturm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27597 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Crissy Marie Monchamp
should be reversed because it was based solely on her statement to the police, without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18170 - 2017-09-21
should be reversed because it was based solely on her statement to the police, without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18170 - 2017-09-21
State v. Crissy Marie Monchamp
] Monchamp claims that the conviction should be reversed because it was based solely on her statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2015-07-30
] Monchamp claims that the conviction should be reversed because it was based solely on her statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by refusing to consider his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by refusing to consider his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by refusing to consider his statements in allocution “that can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by refusing to consider his statements in allocution “that can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01