Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
September 16, 2010
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54435 - 2014-09-15
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54435 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim’s trial testimony that Teasdale did not abuse her and discredited her original statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
the victim’s trial testimony that Teasdale did not abuse her and discredited her original statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
recitation. Both Cole and his counsel agreed with the corrected statement. ¶4 When the trial court asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
recitation. Both Cole and his counsel agreed with the corrected statement. ¶4 When the trial court asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements and arguments constituted misconduct, the test applied is whether the statements ‘so infected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204515 - 2017-12-05
statements and arguments constituted misconduct, the test applied is whether the statements ‘so infected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204515 - 2017-12-05
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
the accuracy of the trial court’s recitation. Both Cole and his counsel agreed with the corrected statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
the accuracy of the trial court’s recitation. Both Cole and his counsel agreed with the corrected statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a “judicial admission” during his opening statement. As argued by the State, a judicial admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
a “judicial admission” during his opening statement. As argued by the State, a judicial admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony S. Szablewski
that the State withheld exculpatory evidence. He argues that one of two statements made by McGowen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11203 - 2017-09-19
that the State withheld exculpatory evidence. He argues that one of two statements made by McGowen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11203 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether, when a false statement that Harkness refused a blood draw is excised from the warrant affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
is whether, when a false statement that Harkness refused a blood draw is excised from the warrant affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that Wortham’s testimony as to Busch’s statement during their telephone conversation was hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83380 - 2014-09-15
argues that Wortham’s testimony as to Busch’s statement during their telephone conversation was hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83380 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was foreclosed from submitting his own written statement and the written statement of a witness. Beaton claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51803 - 2010-07-07
was foreclosed from submitting his own written statement and the written statement of a witness. Beaton claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51803 - 2010-07-07