Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Vlado Gazic
by this expert constituted a statement by the therapist that the children were telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3183 - 2017-09-19
by this expert constituted a statement by the therapist that the children were telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements, which the trial court granted. A.L.D. did not testify at trial. At the close of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
statements, which the trial court granted. A.L.D. did not testify at trial. At the close of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Abraham
the deer with a bow and that his father had registered it. Algrem then handwrote a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5658 - 2017-09-19
the deer with a bow and that his father had registered it. Algrem then handwrote a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5658 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patricia LaBelle
to suppress her statement; (2) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the charge against her because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
to suppress her statement; (2) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the charge against her because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel M. Abraham
and that his father had registered it. Algrem then handwrote a statement that detailed Daniel’s admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31
and that his father had registered it. Algrem then handwrote a statement that detailed Daniel’s admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert O. Schmidt
, and that a written statement No. 98-1717-CR 2 was improperly permitted in the jury room. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14157 - 2014-09-15
, and that a written statement No. 98-1717-CR 2 was improperly permitted in the jury room. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14157 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the required factor of public protection and relied on an improper factor—a victim statement from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713540 - 2023-10-11
the required factor of public protection and relied on an improper factor—a victim statement from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713540 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the basis for the County’s claim of dangerousness—namely, Bob’s statement that he was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811875 - 2024-06-11
contends that the basis for the County’s claim of dangerousness—namely, Bob’s statement that he was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811875 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
WI App 45
language, prohibits the admission of any “statement made or writing signed by the injured person within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191523 - 2018-08-22
language, prohibits the admission of any “statement made or writing signed by the injured person within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191523 - 2018-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
officer to testify as to the parties’ statements recorded in the report, absent independent recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80138 - 2012-03-28
officer to testify as to the parties’ statements recorded in the report, absent independent recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80138 - 2012-03-28