Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 68446 for did.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 68446 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
to provide that the lease would terminate at “11:49 a.m. on the first day of November, 2011.” Fiduciary did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75593 - 2011-12-21
to provide that the lease would terminate at “11:49 a.m. on the first day of November, 2011.” Fiduciary did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75593 - 2011-12-21
State v. Larry G. Edwards
on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did not raise a "new issue" that was distinct from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did not raise a "new issue" that was distinct from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that he did not understand that entering a plea to theft as a repeat offender exposed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62841 - 2014-09-15
testified that he did not understand that entering a plea to theft as a repeat offender exposed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62841 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Sailing
the arresting officer’s initial detention of Sailing violated the Fourth Amendment. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11936 - 2017-09-21
the arresting officer’s initial detention of Sailing violated the Fourth Amendment. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11936 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
, L’Minggio denied that the sexual event ever happened. Only after the DNA results showed his involvement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3973 - 2005-03-31
, L’Minggio denied that the sexual event ever happened. Only after the DNA results showed his involvement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the name of OWC to take those payments; according to Scherer, the clinic did not use Square, and “that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
in the name of OWC to take those payments; according to Scherer, the clinic did not use Square, and “that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they were at the third and final residence.” Trial counsel did not contradict the State except to note
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236519 - 2019-02-28
they were at the third and final residence.” Trial counsel did not contradict the State except to note
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236519 - 2019-02-28
State v. James M. Stratton
for his refusal. ¶3 Stratton did not request a hearing within ten days, or at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3554 - 2005-03-31
for his refusal. ¶3 Stratton did not request a hearing within ten days, or at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19