Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Erik Gracia - 2001AP003395
a statement she gave to the public defender: Q: Now, in the statement that, that you gave to the Public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4710 - 2005-03-31
a statement she gave to the public defender: Q: Now, in the statement that, that you gave to the Public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Erik Gracia - 2001AP003395
. On cross-examination, the State asked Aranka about a statement she gave to the public defender: Q: Now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19
. On cross-examination, the State asked Aranka about a statement she gave to the public defender: Q: Now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alejandro Rivera - 2001AP001791
. In the context of this issue, the report discusses: (1) the admissibility of Rivera’s statements to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
. In the context of this issue, the report discusses: (1) the admissibility of Rivera’s statements to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
State v. Alejandro Rivera - 2001AP001791
discusses: (1) the admissibility of Rivera’s statements to law enforcement officers and a witness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
discusses: (1) the admissibility of Rivera’s statements to law enforcement officers and a witness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Booker Telefaro Shipp, III - 2019AP000504
statements were “the result of illegal coercion on the part of agents of the [S]tate” and should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263490 - 2020-06-09
statements were “the result of illegal coercion on the part of agents of the [S]tate” and should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263490 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smothers - 2000AP003553
replied: “Well, I’m not ready to make no statement.” ¶8 Smothers contends that this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
replied: “Well, I’m not ready to make no statement.” ¶8 Smothers contends that this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel Aguilar - 1997AP000516
at the preliminary hearing. He also claims that it was error to admit prior testimony of a victim and statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
at the preliminary hearing. He also claims that it was error to admit prior testimony of a victim and statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Aguilar - 1997AP000516
and statements the victims made to the police identifying him as one of the robbers. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12114 - 2017-09-21
and statements the victims made to the police identifying him as one of the robbers. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Kosterman - 2012AP000982
a statement without a lawyer. ¶4 Kosterman was taken to the police station to meet with Investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
a statement without a lawyer. ¶4 Kosterman was taken to the police station to meet with Investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy Kosterman - 2012AP000982
rights. Kosterman refused to give a statement without a lawyer. ¶4 Kosterman was taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
rights. Kosterman refused to give a statement without a lawyer. ¶4 Kosterman was taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23